While every effort has been made to monitor citation style rules, there might be part discrepancies.Please describe the ideal style hand-operated or other sources if friend have any type of questions.

You are watching: How tall is amy coney barrett

Corrections? Updates? Omissions? let us know if you have actually suggestions to improve this short article (requires login).
Feedback share a type (Required)Factual CorrectionSpelling/Grammar repair CorrectionAdditional InformationOther

Our editors will evaluation what you’ve submitted and also determine whether to review the article.

Join glossesweb.com"s Publishing companion Program and our ar of professionals to gain a global audience for your work!
Born:January 28, 1972 (age 49)New OrleansLouisiana...(Show more)Title / Office:supreme court (2020-), united StatesSupreme Court of the United states (2020-), joined States...(Show more)Notable family members Members:daughter that Michael Coneydaughter that Linda Coneymarried come Jesse Barrett (1999–present)...(Show more)

Amy Coney Barrett, in complete Amy Vivian Coney Barrett, (born January 28, 1972, new Orleans, Louisiana), combine justice that the can be fried Court the the United states from 2020. She to be the 5th woman to offer on the can be fried Court.

Amy Coney was the very first of eight youngsters of Linda Coney (née Vath), a high-school French teacher, and also Michael Coney, one attorney. Her family members was devoutly roman inn Catholic, belonging come the civilization of Praise, an organization committed to supporting very closely knit Christian communities. Barrett attended Catholic schools and also graduated native the all-girls St. Mary’s Dominican High School.


glossesweb.com Quiz
All-American history Quiz
Who was the initial Edsel? as soon as did a U.S. President an initial appear top top TV? Go ago in time for the all-American answers.

Barrett earned she undergraduate level (magna cum laude) in 1994 native Rhodes college in Memphis, Tennessee. She consequently attended Notre Dame law School in south Bend, Indiana, earning a J.D., or juris physician (summa cum laude), degree in 1997.

Following she graduation from regulation school, Barrett completed 2 prestigious commonwealth clerkships, positions frequently filled because that one year by height graduates from extremely regarded legislation schools. Barrett an initial clerked because that Judge Laurence Silberman of the U.S. Circuit Court the Appeals because that the ar of Columbia Circuit. She climate clerked for can be fried Court justice Antonin Scalia, an prominent conservative jurist and also a prominent advocate of the method of constitution interpretation known as originalism. Scalia was an essential influence on Barrett: top top accepting she nomination come the supreme Court, Barrett would say that Scalia, “His judicial approach is mine, too.”

After clerking, Barrett stayed in Washington, D.C., practicing together an attorney with the regulation firm the Miller, Cassidy, Larroca, & Lewin, which ended up being a part of the global firm Baker Botts in 2001. While in ~ Miller, Barrett functioned for the presidential campaign of George W. Bush in its litigation in Bush v. Gore (2000), the landmark can be fried Court instance that ultimately identified the result of the 2000 choice by ending a legally mandated recount of votes in Florida, resulting in shrub being declared the winner the the state’s pivotal electoral university votes. Barrett is one of three can be fried Court justices—along through Chief Justice man Roberts and also Associate justice Brett Kavanaugh—to have participated in the election litigation on instead of of Bush.

Barrett left private exercise in 2001 to start a job in legit academia. After a yearlong stint as a fellow at the George Washington University regulation School, she went back to Notre Dame regulation School together a professor that law. She teaching and also scholarship focused on constitutional law, constitution theory, statutory interpretation, civil procedure, evidence, and the commonwealth courts. She commonly gave windy lectures illuminating various facets of constitution law and appellate practice. A constant topic of she talks to be originalism, the technique of constitutional translate favoured through conservatives, through which semantic indeterminacies in the text are solved by looking come the initial public meanings of the native in question. Continual venues for she talks were meetings of the Federalist Society, the principal company of the modern-day conservative legitimate movement. Barrett, a member of the society, was a increasing star in the movement, which has actually as among its main goals the filling of commonwealth judgeships with accomplished conservative jurists.

In might 2017 Barrett was nominated through Republican Pres. Donald trump card to fill a chair on the U.S. Circuit Court the Appeals because that the saturday Circuit that had been vacated by the retirement of john Daniel Tinder throughout Pres. Barack Obama’s tenure however that Senate Republicans had actually held open up by refusing to check Obama’s nominee. Throughout Barrett’s confirmation hearings, autonomous Sen. Dianne Feinstein stated to Barrett, “The dogma stays loudly within you,” implying the Barrett’s legal approach was inordinately affected by her religious beliefs. Barrett was confirmed by the Senate on October 31, 2017, through a poll of 55 to 43 (two senators did no vote). The poll was mainly along partisan lines, with just three autonomous senators vote in favour the Barrett’s confirmation, in addition to all 52 Republican senators.

As a circuit court judge, Barrett showed conservative poll patterns. Creating for the court in Grussgott v. Milwaukee Jewish job School (2018), she recognized a religious liberty exception to the Americans v Disabilities act (1990) and also on that ground barred a teacher’s differentiate lawsuit versus the college that had actually employed her. Barrett’s dissenting opinion in Kanter v. Barr (2019) employed an originalist evaluation to come at an expansive reading of the second Amendment’s defense of the individual ideal to possess guns as articulated in Scalia’s opinion for the supreme Court in District that Columbia v. Heller (2008). In Doe v. Purdue University (2019), she organized for the court that a masculine student who had actually been accused of sex-related violence could sue his previous university because that allegedly denying him due process and discriminating against him on the communication of sex in violation of location IX. (Barrett determined merely that the student had presented a precious legal claim; she go not settle the insurance claim itself one method or the other.) because that the court in Yafai v. Pompeo (2019), she favoured a very deferential evaluation of a consular officer’s rejection of a visa application based upon that officer’s decision that the immigrants had actually attempted to smuggle their kids into the unified States. And also in dissent in Cook County v. Wolf (2020), she suggested that the trumped administration’s suggest redefinition that the ax “public charge” in the Immigration and Nationality act (1952), which would considerably reduce the variety of immigrants granted admission to or legal permanent residency in the united States, was no unreasonable. Scholarly analyses of she time ~ above the seventh Circuit discovered her come be among the many conservative judges top top the court.

On September 18, 2020, supreme Court combine Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died. Just over a main later, trumped nominated Barrett to to fill the vacancy. Barrett’s nomination and also confirmation sparked political conflict on both substantive and also procedural grounds.

Barrett’s nomination motivated politically polarized responses based on anticipated results for the problem of can be fried Court decisions: conservatives and Republicans welcomed such changes, yet liberals and Democrats protest them. Barrett’s appointment was supposed to move the Court’s decision-making in a more conservative direction. Via the 2016 Republican Party platform, Trump had committed self to appointing can be fried Court justices that would overturn the Court’s earlier decisions in Roe v. Wade (1973)—which created the (qualified) ideal to abortion—and Obergefell v. Hodges (2015)—which established the right of same-sex couples to marry—and come strike under the Affordable care Act (2010). Prior to Ginsburg’s death, the Court had actually been divided in between five conservative Republican-appointed justices and also four moderate-to-liberal Democratic-appointed judge (including Ginsburg). The Court regularly break-up along ideological lines in high-profile politically charged cases, however in some situations the moderate-liberal bloc would entice the assistance of Roberts, that wielded influence as the average justice—that righteousness whose vote is key in break an otherwise 4–4 tie. V Barrett’s instead of of Ginsburg, the conservative soup of the Court would obtain a 6–3 advantage. Moreover, given the expectation that Barrett’s vote behaviour would be even more conservative 보다 that that Roberts and also the other Republican-appointed justices, Roberts would be displaced together the average justice by another justice (likely Kavanaugh) through a much more consistently conservative poll record. Barrett’s check was hence expected to carry out conservatives through a considerably stronger benefit in cases before the Court, and, consequently, liberals and Democrats opposed her elevation.

Public reaction come Barrett’s nomination was additional polarized end questions about the confirmation process itself. Republican senators were eager to check Barrett quickly, but Democrats complained around what they alleged to be hypocrisy in Republicans’ dealing with of the vacancy, as contrasted with their solution to a similar vacancy just 4 years earlier. ~ Scalia passed away in February 2016, Obama nominated a moderate, Merrick Garland, as his replacement, but the Republican-controlled Senate decreased even to hold hearings on Garland’s nomination. In defense of your norm-breaking refusal, Republican senators argued that, because 2016 to be a presidential choice year, U.S. Voters should have a speak in just how the seat would be filled—by electing the president who would nominate Scalia’s replacement (it was ultimately filled by trumped nominee Neil Gorsuch). Ginsburg also died during a presidential election year, and in fact she died much closer to election day than Scalia had. However in 2020, Senate republicans proceeded v Barrett’s check anyway, asserting that they to be justified in doing for this reason because, uneven in 2016, the very same (Republican) party managed both the White House and also the Senate. Democrats complained that Republicans were being inconsistent and unprincipled and also that the confirmation procedure was being improperly rushed. Part Democrats suggested that if their party were to victory both the Senate and the presidency in the 2020 election, serious factor to consider should be offered to expanding the Court, one of two people to develop a liberal bulk or to restore an approximate ideological balance in between conservative and also liberal justices.

During Barrett’s confirmation hearings, democratic senators request Barrett about her views on several extremely polarized issues, consisting of abortion rights, same-sex marriage, and also the Affordable treatment Act. Consistently with the exercise of many modern-day Supreme Court nominees—including Ginsburg—Barrett refuse to disclose her most likely rulings on problem that could potentially come prior to the Court. Autonomous senators more questioned her about controversial statements make by Trump. Barrett refuse to say even if it is the president can pardon himself, whether she thought in climate change, even if it is the government might separate immigrant youngsters from their parents (as the Trump administration had done), whether voter intimidation is illegal, and whether Trump could refuse to expropriate the an outcome of the upcoming presidential choice (as he had threatened to do). Barrett insisted the she would come to the supreme Court v “no agenda” and also would act together no one’s “pawn.”

Barrett was shown on October 26, 2020, eight days prior to the election. The 52–48 confirmation vote was narrow and also almost completely along party lines: every autonomous senator (and the 2 independent senators who caucused with the Democrats) voted versus her confirmation, in addition to Republican senator Susan Collins that Maine, who described her “no” vote together an expression of her opposition come the hurried effort to confirm Barrett before election day and also not as a judgment of Barrett’s fitness or qualifications to it is in a supreme Court justice. Barrett was then sworn in together the 115th person, and also the fifth woman, to serve as a supreme Court justice.

See more: How To Clean Tiffany Silver Bracelet, How To Clean Tiffany Jewelry

Barrett is married to Jesse Barrett, one attorney and fellow graduate that Notre Dame law School. They have seven children.