Seventeen years after the Sept. 11 terror attacks, the Connecticut supreme Court will certainly this main hear a case involving a Weston mrs fighting come gain access to almost $1.3 million awarded to her daughter together compensation because that the death of the girl’s father at the people Trade Center.
You are watching: How much money did the widows of 9/11 receive
Carolyne Hynes has suggested that a Norwalk probate judge had no authority to block her access to money awarded come her child through the September 11th Victim’s Compensation Fund, produced by Congress. The probate judge had appointed a guardian advertisement litem to oversee the children interests and Hynes as guardian of the children estate and the administrator of her husband’s estate.
decisions by a exceptional Court judge and the Appellate Court have gone versus Hynes’ efforts to have the guardian assigned Probate judge Anthony DePanfilis removed. Top top Monday, Sept. 17, her attorney, Michael Kaelin, will argue the case prior to the state’s highest court.
In a 2014 ruling denying she request, DePanfilis criticize Hynes for spending few of the children money come buy a new house in Weston and also on items such as swimming lessons and vacations. Her attorney referred to as that judgment “factually erroneous.”
thomas Hynes was 28 and also working because that Thomson Financial at the world Trade center when the planes struck ~ above 9/11, death him and also some 2,600 others inside the towers and also on the ground. The pair was life in Norwalk in ~ the time and also Carolyne Hynes was two months pregnant. Your daughter was born the following March.
~ the attack, Congress developed the Victim’s Compensation money to assist family members who lost loved ones and also to stave off wrongful death lawsuits that would certainly clog the courts because that years.
A special master was appointed come determine just how the fund would be doled out and in June 2004 Carolyne Hynes obtained an award of $2.4 million of which $1.27 million was collection aside for your daughter, court records show. The fund designated Carolyne Hynes together the “representative payee,” a designation which she has said gave her control of she daughter’s share.
Hynes at first filed she husband’s probate legacy in April 2003 in Norwalk court where they had lived. As soon as she tried come close out her husband’s heritage the judge instead questioned why the daughter’s award from the money wasn’t consisted of in she father’s estate and questioned why every one of the money had actually been inserted into Carolyne Hynes’ account.
Seeking "American Justice," Blumenthal Urges Federal federal government To Declassify remaining 9/11 Documents
Sen. Richard Blumenthal urges federal federal government to declassify 9/11 documents so families can get justice.
In 2008 DePanfilis appointed lawyer Sharon Jones together a guardian ad litem because that the child and also ordered that her funds be put into a different account. DePanfilis agreed to make Hynes the guardian of she daughter’s legacy in 2012 however has refused to let she use any kind of of the funds. The account has been frozen due to the fact that 2012, according to court documents. That unclear native the records why the case remained in probate court for a number of years.
Hynes had moved to Weston in 2005 and also purchased a brand-new house. DePanfilis alleged the the new house was purchased using few of her daughter’s money — what he claimed was a misuse of the fund. In a created ruling, the referee alleged that as lot as $385,000 may have been misspent.
In 2013, Kaelin advised she to file a movement with DePanfilis to dismiss the guardian and also close the probate situation — saying the probate court had no jurisdiction end the victim’s compensation fund.
however DePanfilis denied the motion in 2014, speak while the fund was draft to rationalization the process for victim “it didn’t speak to on courts to perform away v all logic and laws that were to plan to protect our most fragile constituents.”
Hynes filed a lawsuit specify name the guardian advertisement litem, Sharon Jones, together the defendant. She shed at the Superior and Appellate court levels. Jones has actually not filed any type of legal briefs through the supreme Court and is not intended to argue against Hynes prior to the court.
Kaelin decreased to comment prior to the hearing, however in his legal quick criticized DePanfilis because that accusing Hynes of misspending the money. He created that the probate judge’s decision “was no based upon any kind of evidence presented in a challenged hearing” and also that his “erroneous factual assertions” have negatively impacted Hynes’ case.
See more: How Old Is Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg, Caroline Kennedy
Kaelin has argued as the “representative payee,” Hynes deserve to use the award to salary for her child’s “current needs” and also that the probate court has actually no jurisdiction end it.
most Read ~ above Hartford glossesweb.com See more many Read top top Hartford glossesweb.com articles
below are the Connecticut billionaires that may need to pay up under a proposed brand-new tax to money President Biden’s massive residential spending plan