Ghostbusters: Afterlife quickly topped the box office through $44 million in that debut frame. It is a heavy 2.67x weekend multiplier for the Jason Reitman/Gil Kenan heritage sequel, and a frankly promise debut because that the unapologetic/shameless heritage sequel. Starring a win Mckenna elegant alongside Carrie Coon, Finn Wolfhard and Paul Rudd, the “Force Awakens meets Stranger Things… however Ghostbusters” effort to rotate a singular 1980’s blockbuster right into a routine film franchise could just have operated on the 2nd try. The crucial difference is the this film only price $75 million to produce. If Paul Fieg and Katie Dippold’s perfect enjoyable Ghostbusters: answer the contact (a straight-up remake starring Melissa McCarthy, Kristen Wiig, Leslie Jones and also Kate McKinnon) cost just $75 million instead of $144 million in July 2016, wednesday have gained a $110 million sequel in summer 2019.

You are watching: How much money did ghostbusters 2016 make

Yes, the female-led remake/reboot came to be embroiled in sexist and also racist online backlash and came to it is in arguably the very first successful shot at virtual trolls setup the narrative thanks to SEO-driven media coverage and also an introduction of “fans room saying” news reporting. However, exterior of that no unimportant variable, the well-reviewed (74% and also 6.5/10 top top Rotten Tomatoes) sci-fi comedy earn a halfway decent $126 million residential from a $46 million launch, the biggest complete for a straight-up live-action comedy the year. Alas, Sony vastly overestimated abroad interest in the Ghostbusters IP, and vastly overspent (even if lot of the money is absolutely on the screen). Good faith intentions and also an aspirational gender-swap notwithstanding, a work again, please again of Ghostbusters in the wishes of raised overseas business was just slightly less cynical than Sony’s remakes the Robocop and Total Recall.

At $144 million (IP expenses and a surprise last-minute cancelation in China notwithstanding), a $229 million an international cume to be a advertising disaster. Disney would certainly make the specific same (easily predicted) “overseas audiences don’t care” mistake v Solo: A Star wars Story ($214 million/$394 million) in summer 2018. Together I’ve frankly been saying since the job of John Carter, don’t spend Return the the King money ~ above Fellowship of the Ring. At just $75 million, the film didn’t need to break documents to rest even, and also it deserve to earn grosses top top par through Answer the speak to or even Pixels ($244 million on one $88 million spending plan in 2015) and also be reasonably profitable. Moreover, the film works as a charming family-friendly comic fantasy even if you nothing care around or identify the Easter egg and… uh… Rise that Skywalker moments.

The pandemic and also concurrent opportunistic push toward streaming has actually turned even cynical IP revamps favor Space Jam: A brand-new Legacy and Ghostbusters: immortality into “everybody’s rooting because that them” theatrical underdogs. Nonetheless, Ghostbusters: immortality should advantage from the family-friendly Thanksgiving holiday. V an A- native Cinemascore, it’s a strong contender because that the “consensus pick” offering in between now and also Spider-Man: No means Home in mid-December. Legs like Fantastic Beasts and Where to find Them ($232 million/$74 million on this weekend in 2016) would provide Afterlife $136 million but legs choose Justice organization ($226 million/$93 million in 2017) would leave it at $107 million. Legs prefer Ghostbusters (2016) gets Ghostbusters (2021) come over/under Jungle Cruise ($120 million) and Free guy ($122 million). Kudos to Sony for maintaining the budget plan in check, but I hope Grace it s okay $10 million because that the sequel.


See more: How Much Does A Gram Of Molly Cost ? How Much Does Mdma (Molly) Cost

I"ve learned the film industry, both academically and also informally, and with an emphasis in crate office analysis, for almost 30 years. Ns have extensively written about all of stated subjects because that the critical 13 years. My outlets because that film criticism, crate office commentary, and also film-skewing scholarship have contained The Huffington Post, Salon, and also Film Threat. Monitor me at